update

test/test.base.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import * as plugins from '../ts/plugins.js';
+import * as paths from '../ts/paths.js';
+import { SenderReputationMonitor } from '../ts/deliverability/classes.senderreputationmonitor.js';
+import { IPWarmupManager } from '../ts/deliverability/classes.ipwarmupmanager.js';
+
+/**
+ * Basic test to check if our integrated classes work correctly
+ */
+tap.test('verify that SenderReputationMonitor and IPWarmupManager are functioning', async () => {
+  // Create instances of both classes
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Test SenderReputationMonitor
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'sent', count: 100 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 95 });
+  
+  const reputationData = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('example.com');
+  expect(reputationData).to.not.be.null;
+  
+  const summary = reputationMonitor.getReputationSummary();
+  expect(summary.length).to.be.at.least(1);
+  
+  // Add and remove domains
+  reputationMonitor.addDomain('test.com');
+  reputationMonitor.removeDomain('test.com');
+  
+  // Test IPWarmupManager
+  ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('balanced');
+  
+  const bestIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  if (bestIP) {
+    ipWarmupManager.recordSend(bestIP);
+    const canSendMore = ipWarmupManager.canSendMoreToday(bestIP);
+    expect(typeof canSendMore).to.equal('boolean');
+  }
+  
+  const stageCount = ipWarmupManager.getStageCount();
+  expect(stageCount).to.be.greaterThan(0);
+});
+
+// Final clean-up test
+tap.test('clean up after tests', async () => {
+  // No-op - just to make sure everything is cleaned up properly
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.bouncemanager.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import * as plugins from '../ts/plugins.js';
+import { SzPlatformService } from '../ts/platformservice.js';
+import { BounceManager, BounceType, BounceCategory } from '../ts/email/classes.bouncemanager.js';
+
+/**
+ * Test the BounceManager class
+ */
+tap.test('BounceManager - should be instantiable', async () => {
+  const bounceManager = new BounceManager();
+  expect(bounceManager).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+tap.test('BounceManager - should process basic bounce categories', async () => {
+  const bounceManager = new BounceManager();
+  
+  // Test hard bounce detection
+  const hardBounce = await bounceManager.processBounce({
+    recipient: 'invalid@example.com',
+    sender: 'sender@example.com',
+    smtpResponse: 'user unknown',
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  expect(hardBounce.bounceCategory).toEqual(BounceCategory.HARD);
+  
+  // Test soft bounce detection
+  const softBounce = await bounceManager.processBounce({
+    recipient: 'valid@example.com',
+    sender: 'sender@example.com',
+    smtpResponse: 'server unavailable',
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  expect(softBounce.bounceCategory).toEqual(BounceCategory.SOFT);
+  
+  // Test auto-response detection
+  const autoResponse = await bounceManager.processBounce({
+    recipient: 'away@example.com',
+    sender: 'sender@example.com',
+    smtpResponse: 'auto-reply: out of office',
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  expect(autoResponse.bounceCategory).toEqual(BounceCategory.AUTO_RESPONSE);
+});
+
+tap.test('BounceManager - should add and check suppression list entries', async () => {
+  const bounceManager = new BounceManager();
+  
+  // Add to suppression list permanently
+  bounceManager.addToSuppressionList('permanent@example.com', 'Test hard bounce', undefined);
+  
+  // Add to suppression list temporarily (5 seconds)
+  const expireTime = Date.now() + 5000;
+  bounceManager.addToSuppressionList('temporary@example.com', 'Test soft bounce', expireTime);
+  
+  // Check suppression status
+  expect(bounceManager.isEmailSuppressed('permanent@example.com')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(bounceManager.isEmailSuppressed('temporary@example.com')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(bounceManager.isEmailSuppressed('notsuppressed@example.com')).toEqual(false);
+  
+  // Get suppression info
+  const info = bounceManager.getSuppressionInfo('permanent@example.com');
+  expect(info).toBeTruthy();
+  expect(info.reason).toEqual('Test hard bounce');
+  expect(info.expiresAt).toBeUndefined();
+
+  // Verify temporary suppression info
+  const tempInfo = bounceManager.getSuppressionInfo('temporary@example.com');
+  expect(tempInfo).toBeTruthy();
+  expect(tempInfo.reason).toEqual('Test soft bounce');
+  expect(tempInfo.expiresAt).toEqual(expireTime);
+  
+  // Wait for expiration (6 seconds)
+  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 6000));
+  
+  // Verify permanent suppression is still active
+  expect(bounceManager.isEmailSuppressed('permanent@example.com')).toEqual(true);
+  
+  // Verify temporary suppression has expired
+  expect(bounceManager.isEmailSuppressed('temporary@example.com')).toEqual(false);
+});
+
+tap.test('BounceManager - should process SMTP failures correctly', async () => {
+  const bounceManager = new BounceManager();
+  
+  const result = await bounceManager.processSmtpFailure(
+    'recipient@example.com',
+    '550 5.1.1 User unknown',
+    {
+      sender: 'sender@example.com',
+      statusCode: '550'
+    }
+  );
+  
+  expect(result.bounceType).toEqual(BounceType.INVALID_RECIPIENT);
+  expect(result.bounceCategory).toEqual(BounceCategory.HARD);
+  
+  // Check that the email was added to the suppression list
+  expect(bounceManager.isEmailSuppressed('recipient@example.com')).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+tap.test('BounceManager - should process bounce emails correctly', async () => {
+  const bounceManager = new BounceManager();
+  
+  // Create a mock bounce email as Smartmail
+  const bounceEmail = new plugins.smartmail.Smartmail({
+    from: 'mailer-daemon@example.com',
+    subject: 'Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender',
+    body: `
+      This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
+      
+      A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients.
+      The following address(es) failed:
+      
+      recipient@example.com
+      mailbox is full
+      
+      ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
+      
+      Original-Recipient: rfc822;recipient@example.com
+      Final-Recipient: rfc822;recipient@example.com
+      Status: 5.2.2
+      diagnostic-code: smtp; 552 5.2.2 Mailbox full
+    `,
+    creationObjectRef: {}
+  });
+  
+  const result = await bounceManager.processBounceEmail(bounceEmail);
+  
+  expect(result).toBeTruthy();
+  expect(result.bounceType).toEqual(BounceType.MAILBOX_FULL);
+  expect(result.bounceCategory).toEqual(BounceCategory.HARD);
+  expect(result.recipient).toEqual('recipient@example.com');
+});
+
+tap.test('BounceManager - should handle retries for soft bounces', async () => {
+  const bounceManager = new BounceManager({
+    retryStrategy: {
+      maxRetries: 2,
+      initialDelay: 100, // 100ms for test
+      maxDelay: 1000,
+      backoffFactor: 2
+    }
+  });
+  
+  // First attempt
+  const result1 = await bounceManager.processBounce({
+    recipient: 'retry@example.com',
+    sender: 'sender@example.com',
+    bounceType: BounceType.SERVER_UNAVAILABLE,
+    bounceCategory: BounceCategory.SOFT,
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  // Email should be suppressed temporarily
+  expect(bounceManager.isEmailSuppressed('retry@example.com')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(result1.retryCount).toEqual(1);
+  expect(result1.nextRetryTime).toBeGreaterThan(Date.now());
+  
+  // Second attempt
+  const result2 = await bounceManager.processBounce({
+    recipient: 'retry@example.com',
+    sender: 'sender@example.com',
+    bounceType: BounceType.SERVER_UNAVAILABLE,
+    bounceCategory: BounceCategory.SOFT,
+    domain: 'example.com',
+    retryCount: 1
+  });
+  
+  expect(result2.retryCount).toEqual(2);
+  
+  // Third attempt (should convert to hard bounce)
+  const result3 = await bounceManager.processBounce({
+    recipient: 'retry@example.com',
+    sender: 'sender@example.com',
+    bounceType: BounceType.SERVER_UNAVAILABLE,
+    bounceCategory: BounceCategory.SOFT,
+    domain: 'example.com',
+    retryCount: 2
+  });
+  
+  // Should now be a hard bounce after max retries
+  expect(result3.bounceCategory).toEqual(BounceCategory.HARD);
+  
+  // Email should be suppressed permanently
+  expect(bounceManager.isEmailSuppressed('retry@example.com')).toEqual(true);
+  const info = bounceManager.getSuppressionInfo('retry@example.com');
+  expect(info.expiresAt).toBeUndefined(); // Permanent
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.contentscanner.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import { ContentScanner, ThreatCategory } from '../ts/security/classes.contentscanner.js';
+import { Email } from '../ts/mta/classes.email.js';
+
+// Test instantiation
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should be instantiable', async () => {
+  const scanner = ContentScanner.getInstance({
+    scanBody: true,
+    scanSubject: true,
+    scanAttachments: true
+  });
+  
+  expect(scanner).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+// Test singleton pattern
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should use singleton pattern', async () => {
+  const scanner1 = ContentScanner.getInstance();
+  const scanner2 = ContentScanner.getInstance();
+  
+  // Both instances should be the same object
+  expect(scanner1 === scanner2).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test clean email can be correctly distinguished from high-risk email
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should distinguish between clean and suspicious emails', async () => {
+  // Create an instance with a higher minimum threat score
+  const scanner = new ContentScanner({
+    minThreatScore: 50 // Higher threshold to consider clean
+  });
+  
+  // Create a truly clean email with no potentially sensitive data patterns
+  const cleanEmail = new Email({
+    from: 'sender@example.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.com',
+    subject: 'Project Update',
+    text: 'The project is on track. Let me know if you have questions.',
+    html: '<p>The project is on track. Let me know if you have questions.</p>'
+  });
+  
+  // Create a highly suspicious email
+  const suspiciousEmail = new Email({
+    from: 'admin@bank-fake.com',
+    to: 'victim@example.com',
+    subject: 'URGENT: Your account needs verification now!',
+    text: 'Click here to verify your account or it will be suspended: https://bit.ly/12345',
+    html: '<p>Click here to verify your account or it will be suspended: <a href="https://bit.ly/12345">click here</a></p>'
+  });
+  
+  // Test both emails
+  const cleanResult = await scanner.scanEmail(cleanEmail);
+  const suspiciousResult = await scanner.scanEmail(suspiciousEmail);
+  
+  console.log('Clean vs Suspicious results:', {
+    cleanScore: cleanResult.threatScore,
+    suspiciousScore: suspiciousResult.threatScore
+  });
+  
+  // Verify the scanner can distinguish between them
+  // Suspicious email should have a significantly higher score
+  expect(suspiciousResult.threatScore > cleanResult.threatScore + 40).toEqual(true);
+  
+  // Verify clean email scans all expected elements
+  expect(cleanResult.scannedElements.length > 0).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test phishing detection in subject
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should detect phishing in subject', async () => {
+  // Create a dedicated scanner for this test
+  const scanner = new ContentScanner({
+    scanSubject: true,
+    scanBody: true,
+    scanAttachments: false,
+    customRules: []
+  });
+  
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'security@bank-account-verify.com',
+    to: 'victim@example.com',
+    subject: 'URGENT: Verify your bank account details immediately',
+    text: 'Your account will be suspended. Please verify your details.',
+    html: '<p>Your account will be suspended. Please verify your details.</p>'
+  });
+  
+  const result = await scanner.scanEmail(email);
+  
+  console.log('Phishing email scan result:', result);
+  
+  // We only care that it detected something suspicious
+  expect(result.threatScore >= 20).toEqual(true);
+  
+  // Check if any threat was detected (specific type may vary)
+  expect(result.threatType).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+// Test malware indicators in body
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should detect malware indicators in body', async () => {
+  const scanner = ContentScanner.getInstance();
+  
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'invoice@company.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.com',
+    subject: 'Your invoice',
+    text: 'Please see the attached invoice. You need to enable macros to view this document properly.',
+    html: '<p>Please see the attached invoice. You need to enable macros to view this document properly.</p>'
+  });
+  
+  const result = await scanner.scanEmail(email);
+  
+  expect(result.isClean).toEqual(false);
+  expect(result.threatType === ThreatCategory.MALWARE || result.threatType).toBeTruthy();
+  expect(result.threatScore >= 30).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test suspicious link detection
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should detect suspicious links', async () => {
+  const scanner = ContentScanner.getInstance();
+  
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'newsletter@example.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.com',
+    subject: 'Weekly Newsletter',
+    text: 'Check our latest offer at https://bit.ly/2x3F5 and https://t.co/abc123',
+    html: '<p>Check our latest offer at <a href="https://bit.ly/2x3F5">here</a> and <a href="https://t.co/abc123">here</a></p>'
+  });
+  
+  const result = await scanner.scanEmail(email);
+  
+  expect(result.isClean).toEqual(false);
+  expect(result.threatType).toEqual(ThreatCategory.SUSPICIOUS_LINK);
+  expect(result.threatScore >= 30).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test script injection detection
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should detect script injection', async () => {
+  const scanner = ContentScanner.getInstance();
+  
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'newsletter@example.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.com',
+    subject: 'Newsletter',
+    text: 'Check our website',
+    html: '<p>Check our website</p><script>document.cookie="session="+localStorage.getItem("token");</script>'
+  });
+  
+  const result = await scanner.scanEmail(email);
+  
+  expect(result.isClean).toEqual(false);
+  expect(result.threatType).toEqual(ThreatCategory.XSS);
+  expect(result.threatScore >= 40).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test executable attachment detection
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should detect executable attachments', async () => {
+  const scanner = ContentScanner.getInstance();
+  
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'sender@example.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.com',
+    subject: 'Software Update',
+    text: 'Please install the attached software update.',
+    attachments: [{
+      filename: 'update.exe',
+      content: Buffer.from('MZ...fake executable content...'),
+      contentType: 'application/octet-stream'
+    }]
+  });
+  
+  const result = await scanner.scanEmail(email);
+  
+  expect(result.isClean).toEqual(false);
+  expect(result.threatType).toEqual(ThreatCategory.EXECUTABLE);
+  expect(result.threatScore >= 70).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test macro document detection
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should detect macro documents', async () => {
+  // Create a mock Office document with macro indicators
+  const fakeDocContent = Buffer.from('Document content...vbaProject.bin...Auto_Open...DocumentOpen...Microsoft VBA...');
+  
+  const scanner = ContentScanner.getInstance();
+  
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'sender@example.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.com',
+    subject: 'Financial Report',
+    text: 'Please review the attached financial report.',
+    attachments: [{
+      filename: 'report.docm',
+      content: fakeDocContent,
+      contentType: 'application/vnd.ms-word.document.macroEnabled.12'
+    }]
+  });
+  
+  const result = await scanner.scanEmail(email);
+  
+  expect(result.isClean).toEqual(false);
+  expect(result.threatType).toEqual(ThreatCategory.MALICIOUS_MACRO);
+  expect(result.threatScore >= 60).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test compound threat detection (multiple indicators)
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should detect compound threats', async () => {
+  const scanner = ContentScanner.getInstance();
+  
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'security@bank-verify.com',
+    to: 'victim@example.com',
+    subject: 'URGENT: Verify your account details immediately',
+    text: 'Your account will be suspended unless you verify your details at https://bit.ly/2x3F5',
+    html: '<p>Your account will be suspended unless you verify your details <a href="https://bit.ly/2x3F5">here</a>.</p>',
+    attachments: [{
+      filename: 'verification.exe',
+      content: Buffer.from('MZ...fake executable content...'),
+      contentType: 'application/octet-stream'
+    }]
+  });
+  
+  const result = await scanner.scanEmail(email);
+  
+  expect(result.isClean).toEqual(false);
+  expect(result.threatScore > 70).toEqual(true); // Should have a high score due to multiple threats
+});
+
+// Test custom rules
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should apply custom rules', async () => {
+  // Create a scanner with custom rules
+  const scanner = new ContentScanner({
+    customRules: [
+      {
+        pattern: /CUSTOM_PATTERN_FOR_TESTING/,
+        type: ThreatCategory.CUSTOM_RULE,
+        score: 50,
+        description: 'Custom pattern detected'
+      }
+    ]
+  });
+  
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'sender@example.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.com',
+    subject: 'Test Custom Rule',
+    text: 'This message contains CUSTOM_PATTERN_FOR_TESTING that should be detected.'
+  });
+  
+  const result = await scanner.scanEmail(email);
+  
+  expect(result.isClean).toEqual(false);
+  expect(result.threatType).toEqual(ThreatCategory.CUSTOM_RULE);
+  expect(result.threatScore >= 50).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test threat level classification
+tap.test('ContentScanner - should classify threat levels correctly', async () => {
+  expect(ContentScanner.getThreatLevel(10)).toEqual('none');
+  expect(ContentScanner.getThreatLevel(25)).toEqual('low');
+  expect(ContentScanner.getThreatLevel(50)).toEqual('medium');
+  expect(ContentScanner.getThreatLevel(80)).toEqual('high');
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.deliverability.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import * as plugins from '../ts/plugins.js';
+import * as paths from '../ts/paths.js';
+
+// Import the components we want to test
+import { SenderReputationMonitor } from '../ts/deliverability/classes.senderreputationmonitor.js';
+import { IPWarmupManager } from '../ts/deliverability/classes.ipwarmupmanager.js';
+
+// Ensure test directories exist
+paths.ensureDirectories();
+
+// Test SenderReputationMonitor functionality
+tap.test('SenderReputationMonitor should track sending events', async () => {
+  // Initialize monitor with test domain
+  const monitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['test-domain.com']
+  });
+
+  // Record some events
+  monitor.recordSendEvent('test-domain.com', { type: 'sent', count: 100 });
+  monitor.recordSendEvent('test-domain.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 95 });
+  
+  // Get domain metrics
+  const metrics = monitor.getReputationData('test-domain.com');
+  
+  // Verify metrics were recorded
+  if (metrics) {
+    expect(metrics.volume.sent).toEqual(100);
+    expect(metrics.volume.delivered).toEqual(95);
+  }
+});
+
+// Test IPWarmupManager functionality
+tap.test('IPWarmupManager should handle IP allocation policies', async () => {
+  // Initialize warmup manager
+  const manager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2'],
+    targetDomains: ['test-domain.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Set allocation policy
+  manager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('balanced');
+  
+  // Verify allocation methods work
+  const canSend = manager.canSendMoreToday('192.168.1.1');
+  expect(typeof canSend).toEqual('boolean');
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.emailauth.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import { SzPlatformService } from '../ts/platformservice.js';
+import { SpfVerifier, SpfQualifier, SpfMechanismType } from '../ts/mta/classes.spfverifier.js';
+import { DmarcVerifier, DmarcPolicy, DmarcAlignment } from '../ts/mta/classes.dmarcverifier.js';
+import { Email } from '../ts/mta/classes.email.js';
+
+/**
+ * Test email authentication systems: SPF and DMARC
+ */
+
+// Setup platform service for testing
+let platformService: SzPlatformService;
+
+tap.test('Setup test environment', async () => {
+  platformService = new SzPlatformService();
+  await platformService.init('test');
+  expect(platformService.mtaService).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+// SPF Verifier Tests
+tap.test('SPF Verifier - should parse SPF record', async () => {
+  const spfVerifier = new SpfVerifier(platformService.mtaService);
+  
+  // Test valid SPF record parsing
+  const record = 'v=spf1 a mx ip4:192.168.0.1/24 include:example.org ~all';
+  const parsedRecord = spfVerifier.parseSpfRecord(record);
+  
+  expect(parsedRecord).toBeTruthy();
+  expect(parsedRecord.version).toEqual('spf1');
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms.length).toEqual(5);
+  
+  // Check specific mechanisms
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[0].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.A);
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[0].qualifier).toEqual(SpfQualifier.PASS);
+  
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[1].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.MX);
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[1].qualifier).toEqual(SpfQualifier.PASS);
+  
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[2].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.IP4);
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[2].value).toEqual('192.168.0.1/24');
+  
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[3].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.INCLUDE);
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[3].value).toEqual('example.org');
+  
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[4].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.ALL);
+  expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[4].qualifier).toEqual(SpfQualifier.SOFTFAIL);
+  
+  // Test invalid record
+  const invalidRecord = 'not-a-spf-record';
+  const invalidParsed = spfVerifier.parseSpfRecord(invalidRecord);
+  expect(invalidParsed).toBeNull();
+});
+
+// DMARC Verifier Tests
+tap.test('DMARC Verifier - should parse DMARC record', async () => {
+  const dmarcVerifier = new DmarcVerifier(platformService.mtaService);
+  
+  // Test valid DMARC record parsing
+  const record = 'v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=quarantine; pct=50; adkim=s; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc@example.com';
+  const parsedRecord = dmarcVerifier.parseDmarcRecord(record);
+  
+  expect(parsedRecord).toBeTruthy();
+  expect(parsedRecord.version).toEqual('DMARC1');
+  expect(parsedRecord.policy).toEqual(DmarcPolicy.REJECT);
+  expect(parsedRecord.subdomainPolicy).toEqual(DmarcPolicy.QUARANTINE);
+  expect(parsedRecord.pct).toEqual(50);
+  expect(parsedRecord.adkim).toEqual(DmarcAlignment.STRICT);
+  expect(parsedRecord.aspf).toEqual(DmarcAlignment.RELAXED);
+  expect(parsedRecord.reportUriAggregate).toContain('dmarc@example.com');
+  
+  // Test invalid record
+  const invalidRecord = 'not-a-dmarc-record';
+  const invalidParsed = dmarcVerifier.parseDmarcRecord(invalidRecord);
+  expect(invalidParsed).toBeNull();
+});
+
+tap.test('DMARC Verifier - should verify DMARC alignment', async () => {
+  const dmarcVerifier = new DmarcVerifier(platformService.mtaService);
+  
+  // Test email domains with DMARC alignment
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'sender@example.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.net',
+    subject: 'Test DMARC alignment',
+    text: 'This is a test email'
+  });
+  
+  // Test when both SPF and DKIM pass with alignment
+  const dmarcResult = await dmarcVerifier.verify(
+    email,
+    { domain: 'example.com', result: true },  // SPF - aligned and passed
+    { domain: 'example.com', result: true }   // DKIM - aligned and passed
+  );
+  
+  expect(dmarcResult).toBeTruthy();
+  expect(dmarcResult.spfPassed).toEqual(true);
+  expect(dmarcResult.dkimPassed).toEqual(true);
+  expect(dmarcResult.spfDomainAligned).toEqual(true);
+  expect(dmarcResult.dkimDomainAligned).toEqual(true);
+  expect(dmarcResult.action).toEqual('pass');
+  
+  // Test when neither SPF nor DKIM is aligned
+  const dmarcResult2 = await dmarcVerifier.verify(
+    email,
+    { domain: 'differentdomain.com', result: true },  // SPF - passed but not aligned
+    { domain: 'anotherdomain.com', result: true }     // DKIM - passed but not aligned
+  );
+  
+  expect(dmarcResult2).toBeTruthy();
+  expect(dmarcResult2.spfPassed).toEqual(true);
+  expect(dmarcResult2.dkimPassed).toEqual(true);
+  expect(dmarcResult2.spfDomainAligned).toEqual(false);
+  expect(dmarcResult2.dkimDomainAligned).toEqual(false);
+  // Since there's no DMARC record in test environment, we expect "none" policy
+  expect(dmarcResult2.policyEvaluated).toEqual(DmarcPolicy.NONE);
+});
+
+tap.test('DMARC Verifier - should apply policy correctly', async () => {
+  const dmarcVerifier = new DmarcVerifier(platformService.mtaService);
+  
+  // Create test email
+  const email = new Email({
+    from: 'sender@example.com',
+    to: 'recipient@example.net',
+    subject: 'Test DMARC policy application',
+    text: 'This is a test email'
+  });
+  
+  // Test pass action
+  const passResult = {
+    hasDmarc: true,
+    spfDomainAligned: true,
+    dkimDomainAligned: true,
+    spfPassed: true,
+    dkimPassed: true,
+    policyEvaluated: DmarcPolicy.NONE,
+    actualPolicy: DmarcPolicy.NONE,
+    appliedPercentage: 100,
+    action: 'pass',
+    details: 'DMARC passed'
+  };
+  
+  const passApplied = dmarcVerifier.applyPolicy(email, passResult);
+  expect(passApplied).toEqual(true);
+  expect(email.mightBeSpam).toEqual(false);
+  expect(email.headers['X-DMARC-Result']).toEqual('DMARC passed');
+  
+  // Test quarantine action
+  const quarantineResult = {
+    hasDmarc: true,
+    spfDomainAligned: false,
+    dkimDomainAligned: false,
+    spfPassed: false,
+    dkimPassed: false,
+    policyEvaluated: DmarcPolicy.QUARANTINE,
+    actualPolicy: DmarcPolicy.QUARANTINE,
+    appliedPercentage: 100,
+    action: 'quarantine',
+    details: 'DMARC failed, policy=quarantine'
+  };
+  
+  // Reset email spam flag
+  email.mightBeSpam = false;
+  email.headers = {};
+  
+  const quarantineApplied = dmarcVerifier.applyPolicy(email, quarantineResult);
+  expect(quarantineApplied).toEqual(true);
+  expect(email.mightBeSpam).toEqual(true);
+  expect(email.headers['X-Spam-Flag']).toEqual('YES');
+  expect(email.headers['X-DMARC-Result']).toEqual('DMARC failed, policy=quarantine');
+  
+  // Test reject action
+  const rejectResult = {
+    hasDmarc: true,
+    spfDomainAligned: false,
+    dkimDomainAligned: false,
+    spfPassed: false,
+    dkimPassed: false,
+    policyEvaluated: DmarcPolicy.REJECT,
+    actualPolicy: DmarcPolicy.REJECT,
+    appliedPercentage: 100,
+    action: 'reject',
+    details: 'DMARC failed, policy=reject'
+  };
+  
+  // Reset email spam flag
+  email.mightBeSpam = false;
+  email.headers = {};
+  
+  const rejectApplied = dmarcVerifier.applyPolicy(email, rejectResult);
+  expect(rejectApplied).toEqual(false);
+  expect(email.mightBeSpam).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+tap.test('Cleanup test environment', async () => {
+  await platformService.stop();
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.ipreputationchecker.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import { IPReputationChecker, ReputationThreshold, IPType } from '../ts/security/classes.ipreputationchecker.js';
+import * as plugins from '../ts/plugins.js';
+
+// Mock for dns lookup
+const originalDnsResolve = plugins.dns.promises.resolve;
+let mockDnsResolveImpl: (hostname: string) => Promise<string[]> = async () => ['127.0.0.1'];
+
+// Setup mock DNS resolver
+plugins.dns.promises.resolve = async (hostname: string) => {
+  return mockDnsResolveImpl(hostname);
+};
+
+// Test instantiation
+tap.test('IPReputationChecker - should be instantiable', async () => {
+  const checker = IPReputationChecker.getInstance({
+    enableDNSBL: false,
+    enableIPInfo: false,
+    enableLocalCache: false
+  });
+  
+  expect(checker).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+// Test singleton pattern
+tap.test('IPReputationChecker - should use singleton pattern', async () => {
+  const checker1 = IPReputationChecker.getInstance();
+  const checker2 = IPReputationChecker.getInstance();
+  
+  // Both instances should be the same object
+  expect(checker1 === checker2).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test IP validation
+tap.test('IPReputationChecker - should validate IP address format', async () => {
+  const checker = IPReputationChecker.getInstance({
+    enableDNSBL: false,
+    enableIPInfo: false,
+    enableLocalCache: false
+  });
+  
+  // Valid IP should work
+  const result = await checker.checkReputation('192.168.1.1');
+  expect(result.score).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+  expect(result.error).toBeUndefined();
+  
+  // Invalid IP should fail with error
+  const invalidResult = await checker.checkReputation('invalid.ip');
+  expect(invalidResult.error).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+// Test DNSBL lookups
+tap.test('IPReputationChecker - should check IP against DNSBL', async () => {
+  try {
+    // Setup mock implementation for DNSBL
+    mockDnsResolveImpl = async (hostname: string) => {
+      // Listed in DNSBL if IP contains 2
+      if (hostname.includes('2.1.168.192') && hostname.includes('zen.spamhaus.org')) {
+        return ['127.0.0.2'];
+      }
+      throw { code: 'ENOTFOUND' };
+    };
+
+    // Create a new instance with specific settings for this test
+    const testInstance = new IPReputationChecker({
+      dnsblServers: ['zen.spamhaus.org'],
+      enableIPInfo: false,
+      enableLocalCache: false,
+      maxCacheSize: 1 // Small cache for testing
+    });
+    
+    // Clean IP should have good score
+    const cleanResult = await testInstance.checkReputation('192.168.1.1');
+    expect(cleanResult.isSpam).toEqual(false);
+    expect(cleanResult.score).toEqual(100);
+    
+    // Blacklisted IP should have reduced score
+    const blacklistedResult = await testInstance.checkReputation('192.168.1.2');
+    expect(blacklistedResult.isSpam).toEqual(true);
+    expect(blacklistedResult.score < 100).toEqual(true); // Less than 100
+    expect(blacklistedResult.blacklists).toBeTruthy();
+    expect((blacklistedResult.blacklists || []).length > 0).toEqual(true);
+  } catch (err) {
+    console.error('Test error:', err);
+    throw err;
+  }
+});
+
+// Test caching behavior
+tap.test('IPReputationChecker - should cache reputation results', async () => {
+  // Create a fresh instance for this test
+  const testInstance = new IPReputationChecker({
+    enableIPInfo: false,
+    enableLocalCache: false,
+    maxCacheSize: 10 // Small cache for testing
+  });
+  
+  // Check that first look performs a lookup and second uses cache
+  const ip = '192.168.1.10';
+  
+  // First check should add to cache
+  const result1 = await testInstance.checkReputation(ip);
+  expect(result1).toBeTruthy();
+  
+  // Manually verify it's in cache - access private member for testing
+  const hasInCache = (testInstance as any).reputationCache.has(ip);
+  expect(hasInCache).toEqual(true);
+  
+  // Call again, should use cache
+  const result2 = await testInstance.checkReputation(ip);
+  expect(result2).toBeTruthy();
+  
+  // Results should be identical
+  expect(result1.score).toEqual(result2.score);
+});
+
+// Test risk level classification
+tap.test('IPReputationChecker - should classify risk levels correctly', async () => {
+  expect(IPReputationChecker.getRiskLevel(10)).toEqual('high');
+  expect(IPReputationChecker.getRiskLevel(30)).toEqual('medium');
+  expect(IPReputationChecker.getRiskLevel(60)).toEqual('low');
+  expect(IPReputationChecker.getRiskLevel(90)).toEqual('trusted');
+});
+
+// Test IP type detection
+tap.test('IPReputationChecker - should detect special IP types', async () => {
+  const testInstance = new IPReputationChecker({
+    enableDNSBL: false,
+    enableIPInfo: true,
+    enableLocalCache: false,
+    maxCacheSize: 5 // Small cache for testing
+  });
+  
+  // Test Tor exit node detection
+  const torResult = await testInstance.checkReputation('171.25.1.1');
+  expect(torResult.isTor).toEqual(true);
+  expect(torResult.score < 90).toEqual(true);
+  
+  // Test VPN detection
+  const vpnResult = await testInstance.checkReputation('185.156.1.1');
+  expect(vpnResult.isVPN).toEqual(true);
+  expect(vpnResult.score < 90).toEqual(true);
+  
+  // Test proxy detection
+  const proxyResult = await testInstance.checkReputation('34.92.1.1');
+  expect(proxyResult.isProxy).toEqual(true);
+  expect(proxyResult.score < 90).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+// Test error handling
+tap.test('IPReputationChecker - should handle DNS lookup errors gracefully', async () => {
+  // Setup mock implementation to simulate error
+  mockDnsResolveImpl = async () => {
+    throw new Error('DNS server error');
+  };
+
+  const checker = IPReputationChecker.getInstance({
+    dnsblServers: ['zen.spamhaus.org'],
+    enableIPInfo: false,
+    enableLocalCache: false,
+    maxCacheSize: 300 // Force new instance
+  });
+  
+  // Should return a result despite errors
+  const result = await checker.checkReputation('192.168.1.1');
+  expect(result.score).toEqual(100); // No blacklist hits found due to error
+  expect(result.isSpam).toEqual(false);
+});
+
+// Restore original implementation at the end
+tap.test('Cleanup - restore mocks', async () => {
+  plugins.dns.promises.resolve = originalDnsResolve;
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.ipwarmupmanager.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import * as plugins from '../ts/plugins.js';
+import * as paths from '../ts/paths.js';
+import { IPWarmupManager } from '../ts/deliverability/classes.ipwarmupmanager.js';
+
+// Cleanup any temporary test data
+const cleanupTestData = () => {
+  const warmupDataPath = plugins.path.join(paths.dataDir, 'warmup');
+  if (plugins.fs.existsSync(warmupDataPath)) {
+    plugins.smartfile.memory.unlinkDir(warmupDataPath);
+  }
+};
+
+// Helper to reset the singleton instance between tests
+const resetSingleton = () => {
+  // @ts-ignore - accessing private static field for testing
+  IPWarmupManager._instance = null;
+};
+
+// Before running any tests
+tap.test('setup', async () => {
+  cleanupTestData();
+});
+
+// Test initialization of IPWarmupManager
+tap.test('should initialize IPWarmupManager with default settings', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance();
+  
+  expect(ipWarmupManager).to.be.an('object');
+  expect(ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending).to.be.a('function');
+  expect(ipWarmupManager.canSendMoreToday).to.be.a('function');
+  expect(ipWarmupManager.getStageCount).to.be.a('function');
+  expect(ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy).to.be.a('function');
+});
+
+// Test initialization with custom settings
+tap.test('should initialize IPWarmupManager with custom settings', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com', 'test.com'],
+    fallbackPercentage: 75
+  });
+  
+  // Test setting allocation policy
+  ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('roundRobin');
+  
+  // Get best IP for sending
+  const bestIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  // Check if we can send more today
+  const canSendMore = ipWarmupManager.canSendMoreToday('192.168.1.1');
+  
+  // Check stage count
+  const stageCount = ipWarmupManager.getStageCount();
+  expect(stageCount).to.be.a('number');
+});
+
+// Test IP allocation policies
+tap.test('should allocate IPs using balanced policy', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2', '192.168.1.3'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com', 'test.com'],
+    allocationPolicy: 'balanced'
+  });
+  
+  ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('balanced');
+  
+  // Use getBestIPForSending multiple times and check if all IPs are used
+  const usedIPs = new Set();
+  for (let i = 0; i < 30; i++) {
+    const ip = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+      from: 'test@example.com',
+      to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+      domain: 'example.com'
+    });
+    if (ip) usedIPs.add(ip);
+  }
+  
+  // We should use at least 2 different IPs with balanced policy
+  expect(usedIPs.size).to.be.at.least(2);
+});
+
+// Test round robin allocation policy
+tap.test('should allocate IPs using round robin policy', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2', '192.168.1.3'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com', 'test.com'],
+    allocationPolicy: 'roundRobin'
+  });
+  
+  ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('roundRobin');
+  
+  // First few IPs should rotate through the available IPs
+  const firstIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  const secondIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  const thirdIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  // Round robin should give us different IPs for consecutive calls
+  expect(firstIP).to.not.equal(secondIP);
+  
+  // Fourth call should cycle back to first IP
+  const fourthIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  expect(fourthIP).to.equal(firstIP);
+});
+
+// Test dedicated domain allocation policy
+tap.test('should allocate IPs using dedicated domain policy', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2', '192.168.1.3'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com', 'test.com', 'other.com'],
+    allocationPolicy: 'dedicatedDomain'
+  });
+  
+  ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('dedicatedDomain');
+  
+  // Map domains to IPs
+  ipWarmupManager.mapDomainToIP('example.com', '192.168.1.1');
+  ipWarmupManager.mapDomainToIP('test.com', '192.168.1.2');
+  ipWarmupManager.mapDomainToIP('other.com', '192.168.1.3');
+  
+  // Each domain should get its dedicated IP
+  const exampleIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@gmail.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  const testIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@test.com',
+    to: ['recipient@gmail.com'],
+    domain: 'test.com'
+  });
+  
+  const otherIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@other.com',
+    to: ['recipient@gmail.com'],
+    domain: 'other.com'
+  });
+  
+  expect(exampleIP).to.equal('192.168.1.1');
+  expect(testIP).to.equal('192.168.1.2');
+  expect(otherIP).to.equal('192.168.1.3');
+});
+
+// Test daily sending limits
+tap.test('should enforce daily sending limits', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com'],
+    allocationPolicy: 'balanced'
+  });
+  
+  // Override the warmup stage for testing
+  // @ts-ignore - accessing private method for testing
+  ipWarmupManager.warmupStatus.set('192.168.1.1', {
+    isActive: true,
+    currentStage: 0,
+    startDate: new Date(),
+    dailySendCount: 0,
+    hourlySendCount: {}
+  });
+  
+  // Set a very low daily limit for testing
+  // @ts-ignore - accessing private method for testing
+  ipWarmupManager.warmupStages = [
+    { dailyLimit: 5, duration: 5, hourlyPercentage: { min: 0, max: 40 } }
+  ];
+  
+  // First 5 sends should succeed
+  for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+    const ip = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+      from: 'test@example.com',
+      to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+      domain: 'example.com'
+    });
+    
+    expect(ip).to.equal('192.168.1.1');
+    ipWarmupManager.recordSend(ip);
+  }
+  
+  // 6th send should not get an IP due to daily limit
+  const sixthIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  expect(sixthIP).to.be.null;
+});
+
+// Test recording sends
+tap.test('should record send events correctly', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com'],
+  });
+  
+  // Set allocation policy
+  ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('balanced');
+  
+  // Get an IP for sending
+  const ip = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  // If we got an IP, record some sends
+  if (ip) {
+    // Record a few sends
+    for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+      ipWarmupManager.recordSend(ip);
+    }
+    
+    // Check if we can still send more
+    const canSendMore = ipWarmupManager.canSendMoreToday(ip);
+    expect(canSendMore).to.be.a('boolean');
+  }
+});
+
+// Test that DedicatedDomainPolicy assigns IPs correctly
+tap.test('should assign IPs using dedicated domain policy', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2', '192.168.1.3'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com', 'test.com', 'other.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Set allocation policy to dedicated domains
+  ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('dedicated');
+  
+  // Check allocation by querying for different domains
+  const ip1 = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  const ip2 = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@test.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'test.com'
+  });
+  
+  // If we got IPs, they should be consistently assigned
+  if (ip1 && ip2) {
+    // Requesting the same domain again should return the same IP
+    const ip1again = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+      from: 'another@example.com',
+      to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+      domain: 'example.com'
+    });
+    
+    expect(ip1again).to.equal(ip1);
+  }
+});
+
+// After all tests, clean up
+tap.test('cleanup', async () => {
+  cleanupTestData();
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.minimal.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+import { tap } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import * as plugins from '../ts/plugins.js';
+import * as paths from '../ts/paths.js';
+import { SenderReputationMonitor } from '../ts/deliverability/classes.senderreputationmonitor.js';
+import { IPWarmupManager } from '../ts/deliverability/classes.ipwarmupmanager.js';
+
+/**
+ * Basic test to check if our integrated classes work correctly
+ */
+tap.test('verify that SenderReputationMonitor and IPWarmupManager are functioning', async (tools) => {
+  // Create instances of both classes
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  const ipWarmupManager = IPWarmupManager.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    ipAddresses: ['192.168.1.1', '192.168.1.2'],
+    targetDomains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Test SenderReputationMonitor
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'sent', count: 100 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 95 });
+  
+  const reputationData = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('example.com');
+  const summary = reputationMonitor.getReputationSummary();
+  
+  // Basic checks
+  tools.ok(reputationData, 'Got reputation data');
+  tools.ok(summary.length > 0, 'Got reputation summary');
+  
+  // Add and remove domains
+  reputationMonitor.addDomain('test.com');
+  reputationMonitor.removeDomain('test.com');
+  
+  // Test IPWarmupManager
+  ipWarmupManager.setActiveAllocationPolicy('balanced');
+  
+  const bestIP = ipWarmupManager.getBestIPForSending({
+    from: 'test@example.com',
+    to: ['recipient@test.com'],
+    domain: 'example.com'
+  });
+  
+  if (bestIP) {
+    ipWarmupManager.recordSend(bestIP);
+    const canSendMore = ipWarmupManager.canSendMoreToday(bestIP);
+    tools.ok(canSendMore !== undefined, 'Can check if sending more is allowed');
+  }
+  
+  const stageCount = ipWarmupManager.getStageCount();
+  tools.ok(stageCount > 0, 'Got stage count');
+});
+
+// Final clean-up test
+tap.test('clean up after tests', async () => {
+  // No-op - just to make sure everything is cleaned up properly
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.ratelimiter.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import { RateLimiter } from '../ts/mta/classes.ratelimiter.js';
+
+tap.test('RateLimiter - should be instantiable', async () => {
+  const limiter = new RateLimiter({
+    maxPerPeriod: 10,
+    periodMs: 1000,
+    perKey: true
+  });
+  
+  expect(limiter).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+tap.test('RateLimiter - should allow requests within rate limit', async () => {
+  const limiter = new RateLimiter({
+    maxPerPeriod: 5,
+    periodMs: 1000,
+    perKey: true
+  });
+  
+  // Should allow 5 requests
+  for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+    expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  }
+  
+  // 6th request should be denied
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
+});
+
+tap.test('RateLimiter - should enforce per-key limits', async () => {
+  const limiter = new RateLimiter({
+    maxPerPeriod: 3,
+    periodMs: 1000,
+    perKey: true
+  });
+  
+  // Should allow 3 requests for key1
+  for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+    expect(limiter.isAllowed('key1')).toEqual(true);
+  }
+  
+  // 4th request for key1 should be denied
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('key1')).toEqual(false);
+  
+  // But key2 should still be allowed
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('key2')).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+tap.test('RateLimiter - should refill tokens over time', async () => {
+  const limiter = new RateLimiter({
+    maxPerPeriod: 2,
+    periodMs: 100, // Short period for testing
+    perKey: true
+  });
+  
+  // Use all tokens
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
+  
+  // Wait for refill
+  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 150));
+  
+  // Should have tokens again
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+tap.test('RateLimiter - should support burst allowance', async () => {
+  const limiter = new RateLimiter({
+    maxPerPeriod: 2,
+    periodMs: 100,
+    perKey: true,
+    burstTokens: 2, // Allow 2 extra tokens for bursts
+    initialTokens: 4  // Start with max + burst tokens
+  });
+  
+  // Should allow 4 requests (2 regular + 2 burst)
+  for (let i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+    expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  }
+  
+  // 5th request should be denied
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
+  
+  // Wait for refill
+  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 150));
+  
+  // Should have 2 tokens again (rate-limited to normal max, not burst)
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  
+  // 3rd request after refill should fail (only normal max is refilled, not burst)
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
+});
+
+tap.test('RateLimiter - should return correct stats', async () => {
+  const limiter = new RateLimiter({
+    maxPerPeriod: 10,
+    periodMs: 1000,
+    perKey: true
+  });
+  
+  // Make some requests
+  limiter.isAllowed('test');
+  limiter.isAllowed('test');
+  limiter.isAllowed('test');
+  
+  // Get stats
+  const stats = limiter.getStats('test');
+  
+  expect(stats.remaining).toEqual(7);
+  expect(stats.limit).toEqual(10);
+  expect(stats.allowed).toEqual(3);
+  expect(stats.denied).toEqual(0);
+});
+
+tap.test('RateLimiter - should reset limits', async () => {
+  const limiter = new RateLimiter({
+    maxPerPeriod: 3,
+    periodMs: 1000,
+    perKey: true
+  });
+  
+  // Use all tokens
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
+  
+  // Reset
+  limiter.reset('test');
+  
+  // Should have tokens again
+  expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
+});
+
+export default tap.start();

test/test.reputationmonitor.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+import { tap, expect } from '@push.rocks/tapbundle';
+import * as plugins from '../ts/plugins.js';
+import * as paths from '../ts/paths.js';
+import { SenderReputationMonitor } from '../ts/deliverability/classes.senderreputationmonitor.js';
+
+// Cleanup any temporary test data
+const cleanupTestData = () => {
+  const reputationDataPath = plugins.path.join(paths.dataDir, 'reputation');
+  if (plugins.fs.existsSync(reputationDataPath)) {
+    plugins.smartfile.memory.unlinkDir(reputationDataPath);
+  }
+};
+
+// Helper to reset the singleton instance between tests
+const resetSingleton = () => {
+  // @ts-ignore - accessing private static field for testing
+  SenderReputationMonitor._instance = null;
+};
+
+// Before running any tests
+tap.test('setup', async () => {
+  cleanupTestData();
+});
+
+// Test initialization of SenderReputationMonitor
+tap.test('should initialize SenderReputationMonitor with default settings', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance();
+  
+  expect(reputationMonitor).to.be.an('object');
+  // Check if the object has the expected methods
+  expect(reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent).to.be.a('function');
+  expect(reputationMonitor.getReputationData).to.be.a('function');
+  expect(reputationMonitor.getReputationSummary).to.be.a('function');
+});
+
+// Test initialization with custom settings
+tap.test('should initialize SenderReputationMonitor with custom settings', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['example.com', 'test.com'],
+    updateFrequency: 12 * 60 * 60 * 1000, // 12 hours
+    alertThresholds: {
+      minReputationScore: 80,
+      maxComplaintRate: 0.05
+    }
+  });
+  
+  // Test adding domains
+  reputationMonitor.addDomain('newdomain.com');
+  
+  // Test retrieving reputation data
+  const data = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('example.com');
+  expect(data).to.be.an('object');
+  expect(data.domain).to.equal('example.com');
+});
+
+// Test recording and tracking send events
+tap.test('should record send events and update metrics', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Record a series of events
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'sent', count: 100 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 95 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'bounce', hardBounce: true, count: 3 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'bounce', hardBounce: false, count: 2 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'complaint', count: 1 });
+  
+  // Check metrics
+  const metrics = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('example.com');
+  
+  expect(metrics).to.be.an('object');
+  expect(metrics.volume.sent).to.equal(100);
+  expect(metrics.volume.delivered).to.equal(95);
+  expect(metrics.volume.hardBounces).to.equal(3);
+  expect(metrics.volume.softBounces).to.equal(2);
+  expect(metrics.complaints.total).to.equal(1);
+});
+
+// Test reputation score calculation
+tap.test('should calculate reputation scores correctly', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['high.com', 'medium.com', 'low.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Record events for different domains
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('high.com', { type: 'sent', count: 1000 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('high.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 990 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('high.com', { type: 'open', count: 500 });
+  
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('medium.com', { type: 'sent', count: 1000 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('medium.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 950 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('medium.com', { type: 'open', count: 300 });
+  
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('low.com', { type: 'sent', count: 1000 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('low.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 850 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('low.com', { type: 'open', count: 100 });
+  
+  // Get reputation summary
+  const summary = reputationMonitor.getReputationSummary();
+  expect(summary).to.be.an('array');
+  expect(summary.length).to.be.at.least(3);
+  
+  // Check that domains are included in the summary
+  const domains = summary.map(item => item.domain);
+  expect(domains).to.include('high.com');
+  expect(domains).to.include('medium.com');
+  expect(domains).to.include('low.com');
+});
+
+// Test adding and removing domains
+tap.test('should add and remove domains for monitoring', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Add a new domain
+  reputationMonitor.addDomain('newdomain.com');
+  
+  // Record data for the new domain
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('newdomain.com', { type: 'sent', count: 50 });
+  
+  // Check that data was recorded for the new domain
+  const metrics = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('newdomain.com');
+  expect(metrics).to.be.an('object');
+  expect(metrics.volume.sent).to.equal(50);
+  
+  // Remove a domain
+  reputationMonitor.removeDomain('newdomain.com');
+  
+  // Check that data is no longer available
+  const removedMetrics = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('newdomain.com');
+  expect(removedMetrics).to.be.null;
+});
+
+// Test handling open and click events
+tap.test('should track engagement metrics correctly', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Record basic sending metrics
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'sent', count: 1000 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 950 });
+  
+  // Record engagement events
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'open', count: 500 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'click', count: 250 });
+  
+  // Check engagement metrics
+  const metrics = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('example.com');
+  expect(metrics).to.be.an('object');
+  expect(metrics.engagement.opens).to.equal(500);
+  expect(metrics.engagement.clicks).to.equal(250);
+  expect(metrics.engagement.openRate).to.be.a('number');
+  expect(metrics.engagement.clickRate).to.be.a('number');
+});
+
+// Test historical data tracking
+tap.test('should store historical reputation data', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Record events over multiple days
+  const today = new Date();
+  
+  // Record data
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'sent', count: 1000 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 950 });
+  
+  // Get metrics data
+  const metrics = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('example.com');
+  
+  // Check that historical data exists
+  expect(metrics.historical).to.be.an('object');
+  expect(metrics.historical.reputationScores).to.be.an('object');
+  
+  // Check that daily send volume is tracked
+  expect(metrics.volume.dailySendVolume).to.be.an('object');
+  const todayStr = today.toISOString().split('T')[0];
+  expect(metrics.volume.dailySendVolume[todayStr]).to.equal(1000);
+});
+
+// Test event recording for different event types
+tap.test('should correctly handle different event types', async () => {
+  resetSingleton();
+  const reputationMonitor = SenderReputationMonitor.getInstance({
+    enabled: true,
+    domains: ['example.com']
+  });
+  
+  // Record different types of events
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'sent', count: 100 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'delivered', count: 95 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'bounce', hardBounce: true, count: 3 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'bounce', hardBounce: false, count: 2 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'complaint', receivingDomain: 'gmail.com', count: 1 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'open', count: 50 });
+  reputationMonitor.recordSendEvent('example.com', { type: 'click', count: 25 });
+  
+  // Check metrics for different event types
+  const metrics = reputationMonitor.getReputationData('example.com');
+  
+  // Check volume metrics
+  expect(metrics.volume.sent).to.equal(100);
+  expect(metrics.volume.delivered).to.equal(95);
+  expect(metrics.volume.hardBounces).to.equal(3);
+  expect(metrics.volume.softBounces).to.equal(2);
+  
+  // Check complaint metrics
+  expect(metrics.complaints.total).to.equal(1);
+  expect(metrics.complaints.topDomains[0].domain).to.equal('gmail.com');
+  
+  // Check engagement metrics
+  expect(metrics.engagement.opens).to.equal(50);
+  expect(metrics.engagement.clicks).to.equal(25);
+});
+
+// After all tests, clean up
+tap.test('cleanup', async () => {
+  cleanupTestData();
+});
+
+export default tap.start();