fix(core): Update build scripts, refine testing assertions, and enhance documentation
This commit is contained in:
210
readme.plan.md
210
readme.plan.md
@@ -1,72 +1,170 @@
|
||||
# SmartFuzzy Improvement Plan
|
||||
# SmartFuzzy Improvement Plan - Fuse.js Optimization Focus
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Status
|
||||
- ESM imports/exports fixed with .js extensions
|
||||
- Basic fuzzy matching functionality works
|
||||
- Testing infrastructure fixed with @git.zone/tsrun dependency
|
||||
- Test syntax needs standardization (converting from chai-style to SmartExpect syntax)
|
||||
- Using older versions of dependencies
|
||||
- Test syntax standardized using SmartExpect syntax
|
||||
- Tests improved with proper assertions and error handling
|
||||
- Input validation added to all public methods
|
||||
- Code documented with comprehensive TypeScript JSDoc comments
|
||||
|
||||
## Improvement Plan
|
||||
## Improvement Plan - Fuse.js Optimization Focus
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Testing Improvements
|
||||
### 1. Fully Leverage Fuse.js Capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1.1 Update Test Syntax and Standards
|
||||
- [ ] Convert all tests from chai-style syntax (`expect().to.be`) to SmartExpect syntax (`expect().toBeInstanceOf()`)
|
||||
- [ ] Implement consistent test structure across all test files
|
||||
- [ ] Add proper setup and teardown patterns where needed
|
||||
- [ ] Replace console.log statements with proper assertions to validate results
|
||||
- [ ] Add descriptive error messages to assertions to improve test debugging
|
||||
#### 1.1 Enhance Configurability
|
||||
- [ ] Create a comprehensive `FuzzyOptions` interface exposing Fuse.js options
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Expose all relevant Fuse.js options (threshold, distance, location, etc.)
|
||||
- Group options logically (matching control, performance control, output control)
|
||||
- Add proper TypeScript types and documentation for each option
|
||||
- Create sensible defaults for different use cases (loose matching, exact matching, etc.)
|
||||
- Add option validation with clear error messages
|
||||
- Implement runtime option updates via setOptions() method
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1.2 Expand Test Coverage
|
||||
- [ ] Add tests for empty dictionaries and edge cases
|
||||
- [ ] Test with extremely large dictionaries to verify performance
|
||||
- [ ] Add tests for unicode/special character handling
|
||||
- [ ] Test with very similar strings to validate fuzzy matching accuracy
|
||||
- [ ] Add tests for error conditions and input validation
|
||||
- [ ] Implement tests for all public APIs and features
|
||||
#### 1.2 Improve Weighted Field Support
|
||||
- [ ] Enhance ObjectSorter to support field weights like ArticleSearch
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Add ability to specify weight per field in ObjectSorter
|
||||
- Maintain backward compatibility with current simple array of fields
|
||||
- Create examples of different weighting strategies
|
||||
- Add tests demonstrating the effect of different field weights
|
||||
- Include weight settings in all relevant documentation
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Code Quality Improvements
|
||||
- [ ] Add proper TypeScript documentation comments to all public methods
|
||||
- [ ] Implement consistent error handling
|
||||
- [ ] Add input validation for all public methods
|
||||
- [ ] Standardize method naming conventions (e.g., get* vs find*)
|
||||
#### 1.3 Add Extended Search Capabilities
|
||||
- [ ] Implement Fuse.js extended search syntax support
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Add support for Fuse.js extended search syntax (AND, OR, exact matching)
|
||||
- Create helper methods to build complex search queries
|
||||
- Add examples of extended search usage in documentation
|
||||
- Create tests for complex search patterns
|
||||
- Implement query validation for extended search syntax
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Feature Enhancements
|
||||
- [ ] Add configurable threshold options for matching
|
||||
- [ ] Implement stemming/lemmatization support for better text matching
|
||||
- [ ] Add language-specific matching options
|
||||
- [ ] Support for weighted matching across multiple fields
|
||||
- [ ] Add batch processing capabilities for large datasets
|
||||
### 2. Performance Optimization
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Performance Optimizations
|
||||
- [ ] Implement caching for repeated searches
|
||||
- [ ] Optimize indexing for large dictionaries
|
||||
- [ ] Add benchmarking tests to measure performance improvements
|
||||
#### 2.1 Optimize Index Creation
|
||||
- [ ] Implement proper Fuse.js index management
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Create persistent indices instead of rebuilding for each search
|
||||
- Add incremental index updates when items are added/removed
|
||||
- Implement proper index serialization and deserialization
|
||||
- Add option to lazily rebuild indices
|
||||
- Create tests measuring index creation performance
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Dependencies and Build System
|
||||
- [ ] Update to latest versions of dependencies
|
||||
- [ ] Ensure proper tree-shaking for browser bundle
|
||||
- [ ] Add browser-specific build configuration
|
||||
- [ ] Implement proper ES module / CommonJS dual package setup
|
||||
#### 2.2 Implement Basic Caching
|
||||
- [ ] Add results caching for repeated queries
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Implement simple Map-based cache for query results
|
||||
- Add cache invalidation on dictionary/object changes
|
||||
- Create configurable cache size limits
|
||||
- Add cache hit/miss tracking for debugging
|
||||
- Implement optional cache persistence
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Documentation
|
||||
- [ ] Create comprehensive API documentation
|
||||
- [ ] Add usage examples for common scenarios
|
||||
- [ ] Create benchmarks comparing to other fuzzy matching libraries
|
||||
- [ ] Document performance characteristics and optimization strategies
|
||||
#### 2.3 Add Async Processing for Large Datasets
|
||||
- [ ] Implement non-blocking search operations for large datasets
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Create async versions of search methods that don't block main thread
|
||||
- Implement chunked processing for large dictionaries
|
||||
- Add progress tracking for long operations
|
||||
- Create cancellable search operations
|
||||
- Add proper promise handling and error propagation
|
||||
- Measure performance difference between sync and async methods
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Developer Experience
|
||||
- [ ] Add VS Code debugging configuration
|
||||
- [ ] Implement changelog generation
|
||||
- [ ] Set up automated release process
|
||||
- [ ] Add contribution guidelines
|
||||
### 3. API Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
## Priority Order
|
||||
1. Fix testing infrastructure (critical)
|
||||
2. Code quality improvements (high)
|
||||
3. Documentation (high)
|
||||
4. Feature enhancements (medium)
|
||||
5. Performance optimizations (medium)
|
||||
6. Dependencies and build system (medium)
|
||||
7. Developer experience (low)
|
||||
#### 3.1 Standardize Method Naming
|
||||
- [ ] Standardize all method names for consistency
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Rename `getClosestMatchForString` to `findClosestMatch`
|
||||
- Rename `getChangeScoreForString` to `calculateScores`
|
||||
- Create backward compatibility aliases with @deprecated tags
|
||||
- Update all tests and documentation with new method names
|
||||
- Add migration guide for users
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.2 Add Chainable API
|
||||
- [ ] Create a more fluent API for complex searches
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Implement chainable methods for setting options
|
||||
- Add result transformation methods (map, filter, sort)
|
||||
- Create fluent search building interface
|
||||
- Implement method chaining for filters and transformations
|
||||
- Add proper TypeScript type inference for chainable methods
|
||||
- Create examples demonstrating the chainable API
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.3 Enhance Return Types
|
||||
- [ ] Improve result objects with more useful information
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Standardize return types across all search methods
|
||||
- Add richer match information (character positions, context)
|
||||
- Implement highlighting helpers for match visualization
|
||||
- Add metadata to search results (time taken, options used)
|
||||
- Create proper TypeScript interfaces for all result types
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Documentation and Examples
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.1 Create Comprehensive Documentation
|
||||
- [ ] Improve documentation with Fuse.js-specific information
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Generate TypeDoc documentation from JSDoc comments
|
||||
- Create specific sections for Fuse.js integration details
|
||||
- Add visual diagrams showing how Fuse.js is utilized
|
||||
- Document all configuration options with examples
|
||||
- Add performance guidelines based on Fuse.js recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.2 Create Usage Examples
|
||||
- [ ] Add specialized examples for common search patterns
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Create examples for typical search scenarios (autocomplete, filtering, etc.)
|
||||
- Add examples of weighted searching for different use cases
|
||||
- Demonstrate extended search syntax with examples
|
||||
- Create comparative examples showing different configuration effects
|
||||
- Add performance optimization examples
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Testing Enhancements
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5.1 Add Fuse.js-specific Tests
|
||||
- [ ] Create tests focused on Fuse.js features
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Add tests for all Fuse.js configuration options
|
||||
- Create performance comparison tests for different settings
|
||||
- Implement tests for extended search syntax
|
||||
- Add tests for very large datasets
|
||||
- Create index persistence and rebuilding tests
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5.2 Add Edge Case Tests
|
||||
- [ ] Improve test coverage for Fuse.js edge cases
|
||||
- **Implementation approach**:
|
||||
- Test with unusual strings (very long, special characters, etc.)
|
||||
- Add tests for multilingual content
|
||||
- Create tests for zero-match and all-match cases
|
||||
- Implement tests for threshold boundary conditions
|
||||
- Add tests for unusual scoring scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Priority
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Core Improvements (1-2 weeks)
|
||||
- [ ] API Improvements (3.1 Standardize Method Naming)
|
||||
- [ ] Configurability Enhancements (1.1 Enhance Configurability)
|
||||
- [ ] Documentation Updates (4.1 Create Comprehensive Documentation)
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Performance Optimizations (1-2 weeks)
|
||||
- [ ] Optimize Index Creation (2.1)
|
||||
- [ ] Implement Basic Caching (2.2)
|
||||
- [ ] Add Fuse.js-specific Tests (5.1)
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Advanced Features (2-3 weeks)
|
||||
- [ ] Improve Weighted Field Support (1.2)
|
||||
- [ ] Add Extended Search Capabilities (1.3)
|
||||
- [ ] Add Chainable API (3.2)
|
||||
- [ ] Enhance Return Types (3.3)
|
||||
- [ ] Add Async Processing for Large Datasets (2.3)
|
||||
- [ ] Create Usage Examples (4.2)
|
||||
- [ ] Add Edge Case Tests (5.2)
|
||||
|
||||
## Expected Outcomes
|
||||
- Significantly improved performance for large datasets
|
||||
- More flexible and powerful search capabilities
|
||||
- Better developer experience with improved API design
|
||||
- Clearer understanding of the library through better documentation
|
||||
- Higher test coverage, particularly for edge cases and performance scenarios
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user