BREAKING CHANGE(mail): remove DMARC and DKIM verifier implementations and MTA error classes; introduce DkimManager and EmailActionExecutor; simplify SPF verifier and update routing exports and tests
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,195 +1,46 @@
|
||||
import { tap, expect } from '@git.zone/tstest/tapbundle';
|
||||
import { SpfVerifier, SpfQualifier, SpfMechanismType } from '../ts/mail/security/classes.spfverifier.js';
|
||||
import { DmarcVerifier, DmarcPolicy, DmarcAlignment } from '../ts/mail/security/classes.dmarcverifier.js';
|
||||
import { Email } from '../ts/mail/core/classes.email.js';
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test email authentication systems: SPF and DMARC
|
||||
* Test email authentication systems: SPF parsing
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// SPF Verifier Tests
|
||||
tap.test('SPF Verifier - should parse SPF record', async () => {
|
||||
const spfVerifier = new SpfVerifier();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Test valid SPF record parsing
|
||||
const record = 'v=spf1 a mx ip4:192.168.0.1/24 include:example.org ~all';
|
||||
const parsedRecord = spfVerifier.parseSpfRecord(record);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.version).toEqual('spf1');
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms.length).toEqual(5);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Check specific mechanisms
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[0].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.A);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[0].qualifier).toEqual(SpfQualifier.PASS);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[1].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.MX);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[1].qualifier).toEqual(SpfQualifier.PASS);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[2].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.IP4);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[2].value).toEqual('192.168.0.1/24');
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[3].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.INCLUDE);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[3].value).toEqual('example.org');
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[4].type).toEqual(SpfMechanismType.ALL);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.mechanisms[4].qualifier).toEqual(SpfQualifier.SOFTFAIL);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Test invalid record
|
||||
const invalidRecord = 'not-a-spf-record';
|
||||
const invalidParsed = spfVerifier.parseSpfRecord(invalidRecord);
|
||||
expect(invalidParsed).toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// DMARC Verifier Tests
|
||||
tap.test('DMARC Verifier - should parse DMARC record', async () => {
|
||||
const dmarcVerifier = new DmarcVerifier();
|
||||
|
||||
// Test valid DMARC record parsing
|
||||
const record = 'v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=quarantine; pct=50; adkim=s; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc@example.com';
|
||||
const parsedRecord = dmarcVerifier.parseDmarcRecord(record);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.version).toEqual('DMARC1');
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.policy).toEqual(DmarcPolicy.REJECT);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.subdomainPolicy).toEqual(DmarcPolicy.QUARANTINE);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.pct).toEqual(50);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.adkim).toEqual(DmarcAlignment.STRICT);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.aspf).toEqual(DmarcAlignment.RELAXED);
|
||||
expect(parsedRecord.reportUriAggregate).toContain('dmarc@example.com');
|
||||
|
||||
// Test invalid record
|
||||
const invalidRecord = 'not-a-dmarc-record';
|
||||
const invalidParsed = dmarcVerifier.parseDmarcRecord(invalidRecord);
|
||||
expect(invalidParsed).toBeNull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('DMARC Verifier - should verify DMARC alignment', async () => {
|
||||
const dmarcVerifier = new DmarcVerifier();
|
||||
|
||||
// Test email domains with DMARC alignment
|
||||
const email = new Email({
|
||||
from: 'sender@example.com',
|
||||
to: 'recipient@example.net',
|
||||
subject: 'Test DMARC alignment',
|
||||
text: 'This is a test email'
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Test when both SPF and DKIM pass with alignment
|
||||
const dmarcResult = await dmarcVerifier.verify(
|
||||
email,
|
||||
{ domain: 'example.com', result: true }, // SPF - aligned and passed
|
||||
{ domain: 'example.com', result: true } // DKIM - aligned and passed
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult.spfPassed).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult.dkimPassed).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult.spfDomainAligned).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult.dkimDomainAligned).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult.action).toEqual('pass');
|
||||
|
||||
// Test when neither SPF nor DKIM is aligned
|
||||
const dmarcResult2 = await dmarcVerifier.verify(
|
||||
email,
|
||||
{ domain: 'differentdomain.com', result: true }, // SPF - passed but not aligned
|
||||
{ domain: 'anotherdomain.com', result: true } // DKIM - passed but not aligned
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Without a DNS manager, no DMARC record will be found
|
||||
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2.spfPassed).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2.dkimPassed).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2.spfDomainAligned).toEqual(false);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2.dkimDomainAligned).toEqual(false);
|
||||
|
||||
// Without a DMARC record, the default action is 'pass'
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2.hasDmarc).toEqual(false);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2.policyEvaluated).toEqual(DmarcPolicy.NONE);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2.actualPolicy).toEqual(DmarcPolicy.NONE);
|
||||
expect(dmarcResult2.action).toEqual('pass');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('DMARC Verifier - should apply policy correctly', async () => {
|
||||
const dmarcVerifier = new DmarcVerifier();
|
||||
|
||||
// Create test email
|
||||
const email = new Email({
|
||||
from: 'sender@example.com',
|
||||
to: 'recipient@example.net',
|
||||
subject: 'Test DMARC policy application',
|
||||
text: 'This is a test email'
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Test pass action
|
||||
const passResult: any = {
|
||||
hasDmarc: true,
|
||||
spfDomainAligned: true,
|
||||
dkimDomainAligned: true,
|
||||
spfPassed: true,
|
||||
dkimPassed: true,
|
||||
policyEvaluated: DmarcPolicy.NONE,
|
||||
actualPolicy: DmarcPolicy.NONE,
|
||||
appliedPercentage: 100,
|
||||
action: 'pass',
|
||||
details: 'DMARC passed'
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const passApplied = dmarcVerifier.applyPolicy(email, passResult);
|
||||
expect(passApplied).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(email.mightBeSpam).toEqual(false);
|
||||
expect(email.headers['X-DMARC-Result']).toEqual('DMARC passed');
|
||||
|
||||
// Test quarantine action
|
||||
const quarantineResult: any = {
|
||||
hasDmarc: true,
|
||||
spfDomainAligned: false,
|
||||
dkimDomainAligned: false,
|
||||
spfPassed: false,
|
||||
dkimPassed: false,
|
||||
policyEvaluated: DmarcPolicy.QUARANTINE,
|
||||
actualPolicy: DmarcPolicy.QUARANTINE,
|
||||
appliedPercentage: 100,
|
||||
action: 'quarantine',
|
||||
details: 'DMARC failed, policy=quarantine'
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Reset email spam flag
|
||||
email.mightBeSpam = false;
|
||||
email.headers = {};
|
||||
|
||||
const quarantineApplied = dmarcVerifier.applyPolicy(email, quarantineResult);
|
||||
expect(quarantineApplied).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(email.mightBeSpam).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(email.headers['X-Spam-Flag']).toEqual('YES');
|
||||
expect(email.headers['X-DMARC-Result']).toEqual('DMARC failed, policy=quarantine');
|
||||
|
||||
// Test reject action
|
||||
const rejectResult: any = {
|
||||
hasDmarc: true,
|
||||
spfDomainAligned: false,
|
||||
dkimDomainAligned: false,
|
||||
spfPassed: false,
|
||||
dkimPassed: false,
|
||||
policyEvaluated: DmarcPolicy.REJECT,
|
||||
actualPolicy: DmarcPolicy.REJECT,
|
||||
appliedPercentage: 100,
|
||||
action: 'reject',
|
||||
details: 'DMARC failed, policy=reject'
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Reset email spam flag
|
||||
email.mightBeSpam = false;
|
||||
email.headers = {};
|
||||
|
||||
const rejectApplied = dmarcVerifier.applyPolicy(email, rejectResult);
|
||||
expect(rejectApplied).toEqual(false);
|
||||
expect(email.mightBeSpam).toEqual(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('stop', async () => {
|
||||
await tap.stopForcefully();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export default tap.start();
|
||||
export default tap.start();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,141 +0,0 @@
|
||||
import { tap, expect } from '@git.zone/tstest/tapbundle';
|
||||
import { RateLimiter } from '../ts/mail/delivery/classes.ratelimiter.js';
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('RateLimiter - should be instantiable', async () => {
|
||||
const limiter = new RateLimiter({
|
||||
maxPerPeriod: 10,
|
||||
periodMs: 1000,
|
||||
perKey: true
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(limiter).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('RateLimiter - should allow requests within rate limit', async () => {
|
||||
const limiter = new RateLimiter({
|
||||
maxPerPeriod: 5,
|
||||
periodMs: 1000,
|
||||
perKey: true
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Should allow 5 requests
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 6th request should be denied
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('RateLimiter - should enforce per-key limits', async () => {
|
||||
const limiter = new RateLimiter({
|
||||
maxPerPeriod: 3,
|
||||
periodMs: 1000,
|
||||
perKey: true
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Should allow 3 requests for key1
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('key1')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 4th request for key1 should be denied
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('key1')).toEqual(false);
|
||||
|
||||
// But key2 should still be allowed
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('key2')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('RateLimiter - should refill tokens over time', async () => {
|
||||
const limiter = new RateLimiter({
|
||||
maxPerPeriod: 2,
|
||||
periodMs: 100, // Short period for testing
|
||||
perKey: true
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Use all tokens
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait for refill
|
||||
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 150));
|
||||
|
||||
// Should have tokens again
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('RateLimiter - should support burst allowance', async () => {
|
||||
const limiter = new RateLimiter({
|
||||
maxPerPeriod: 2,
|
||||
periodMs: 100,
|
||||
perKey: true,
|
||||
burstTokens: 2, // Allow 2 extra tokens for bursts
|
||||
initialTokens: 4 // Start with max + burst tokens
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Should allow 4 requests (2 regular + 2 burst)
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 5th request should be denied
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait for refill
|
||||
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 150));
|
||||
|
||||
// Should have 2 tokens again (rate-limited to normal max, not burst)
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
|
||||
// 3rd request after refill should fail (only normal max is refilled, not burst)
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('RateLimiter - should return correct stats', async () => {
|
||||
const limiter = new RateLimiter({
|
||||
maxPerPeriod: 10,
|
||||
periodMs: 1000,
|
||||
perKey: true
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Make some requests
|
||||
limiter.isAllowed('test');
|
||||
limiter.isAllowed('test');
|
||||
limiter.isAllowed('test');
|
||||
|
||||
// Get stats
|
||||
const stats = limiter.getStats('test');
|
||||
|
||||
expect(stats.remaining).toEqual(7);
|
||||
expect(stats.limit).toEqual(10);
|
||||
expect(stats.allowed).toEqual(3);
|
||||
expect(stats.denied).toEqual(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('RateLimiter - should reset limits', async () => {
|
||||
const limiter = new RateLimiter({
|
||||
maxPerPeriod: 3,
|
||||
periodMs: 1000,
|
||||
perKey: true
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Use all tokens
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(false);
|
||||
|
||||
// Reset
|
||||
limiter.reset('test');
|
||||
|
||||
// Should have tokens again
|
||||
expect(limiter.isAllowed('test')).toEqual(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
tap.test('stop', async () => {
|
||||
await tap.stopForcefully();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export default tap.start();
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user