update
This commit is contained in:
@@ -29,12 +29,30 @@ TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'type')
|
||||
**Evidence**: Tests specifically designed to verify callback preservation after route updates.
|
||||
**Impact**: Dynamic route updates might break certificate management functionality.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Route-Specific Security Not Fully Implemented
|
||||
**Problem**: While the route definitions support security configurations (ipAllowList, ipBlockList, authentication), these are not being enforced at the route level.
|
||||
**Evidence**:
|
||||
- SecurityManager has methods like `isIPAuthorized` for route-specific security
|
||||
- Route connection handler only checks global IP validation, not route-specific security rules
|
||||
- No evidence of route.action.security being checked when handling connections
|
||||
**Impact**: Route-specific security rules defined in configuration are not enforced, potentially allowing unauthorized access.
|
||||
**Status**: ✅ FIXED - Route-specific IP allow/block lists are now enforced when a route is matched. Authentication is logged as not enforceable for non-terminated connections.
|
||||
**Additional Fix**: Removed security checks from route matching logic - security is now properly enforced AFTER a route is matched, not during matching.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Security Property Location Consolidation
|
||||
**Problem**: Security was defined in two places - route.security and route.action.security - causing confusion.
|
||||
**Status**: ✅ FIXED - Consolidated to only route.security. Removed action.security from types and updated all references.
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Verify Forward Action Implementation**: Check that the 'forward' action type properly establishes bidirectional data flow between client and target server.
|
||||
1. **Verify Forward Action Implementation**: Check that the 'forward' action type properly establishes bidirectional data flow between client and target server. ✅ FIXED - Basic forwarding now works correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Fix HttpProxy Route Handling**: Ensure that route objects passed to HttpProxy.updateRouteConfigs have the expected structure with all required properties.
|
||||
2. **Fix HttpProxy Route Handling**: Ensure that route objects passed to HttpProxy.updateRouteConfigs have the expected structure with all required properties. ✅ FIXED - Routes now preserve their structure.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Review Certificate Manager API**: Ensure all expected methods exist and are properly documented.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Add Integration Tests**: Many unit tests are testing internal implementation details. Consider adding more integration tests that test the public API.
|
||||
4. **Add Integration Tests**: Many unit tests are testing internal implementation details. Consider adding more integration tests that test the public API.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Implement Route-Specific Security**: Add security checks when a route is matched to enforce route-specific IP allow/block lists and authentication rules. ✅ FIXED - IP allow/block lists are now enforced at the route level.
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Fix TLS Detection Logic**: The connection handler was treating all connections as TLS. This has been partially fixed but needs proper testing for all TLS modes.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user